B.Huldah & Company

B.Huldah & Company, research and developement. Passionate about preserving historical and religious truths.

           The New Deal for the New World Order

                 Original Photo 1943 - Family owned photo - Casablanca Confrence 


Radio address Feb. 12th 1943- Short version: The Axis Nations are up to their old tricks in order to divide the United Nations. This is their final effort to turn one Nation against another, wanting us to make deals with them so that in hopes they can create the idea that if we win this war, Russia England, China, and the United States will get into a cat and dog fight. Their wanting to make a deal. The only deals and terms on which we will make with the Axis Government or any fractions are these "The terms proclaimed at Casablanca "Unconditional Surrender" and in our policy we mean no harm to the common people of the Axis nations. It is of our war aims as expressed in the "Atlantic Charter" that the conquered populations of today be again the 'MASTERS' of their destiny. But what Roosevelt didn't tell The PEOPLE in his radio address was that he was a 33rd degree Mason and what plans he had for The United States. "THIS" NOVUS ORDO SECLORUM, means, "a new order for the ages." Franklin D. Roosevelt wanted to change the meaning slightly to "a new order has begun," wanting to connect that with a "New Deal". FDR and the Casablanca Conference 1943

From January 14 to January 24, 1943, the first war conference between the Allied Powers, was held in Casablanca, Morocco. The purpose of the conference was relatively vague. It took steps toward planning the allied strategy and the end of the war. Initially, it was to be a Big Three meeting between Roosevelt, Churchill, and Stalin. It became a Big Two meeting when Stalin declined the invitation. With his country besieged by both Hitler and the harsh winter, Stalin didn't feel that he could leave. Even without Stalin, or perhaps due to his absence, the Casablanca Conference was successful. It set basis and direction for the rest of the war. And most importantly, it established terms of unconditional surrender.

No sitting President had ever been to Africa, nor had a U.S. President ever left the country during a time of war. But in the middle of January 1943, FDR became the first President to do these things. At the time, these firsts were very important in the public's mind. All newspaper articles of the time reminded the public again and again of these firsts. For example, a long detailed article about the entire Conference started by describing these firsts. (Appointment 11) How and when Roosevelt left the U.S. and arrived in Morocco was kept secret. The President's trip itself wasn't disclosed to the public until he was already safely back in Washington. Based on newspaper headlines of the time, like "Bullets, Mystery, Secrecy, and Censorship Plagued Reporters of Casablanca Conference," it is safe to assume that the press wasn't happy about the lack of information provided. Both Roosevelt and Churchill went to Casablanca equipped with modern aircraft, cars, jeeps, caravans and most importantly guards. The Conference took place in a hotel, likened to a mansion, in a room called simply Villa Number 2. The hotel was heavily guarded and surrounded by barbed wire, but that didn't stop Churchill and Roosevelt from taking jeep trips to the medieval marketplace in town and presenting a unified front to German spies and the world.

The most significant accomplishment of the Casablanca Conference was the approval by both Roosevelt and Churchill of the policy of unconditional surrender of the Axis powers. To most, the condition of unconditional surrender seemed to make the most sense. None of the newspapers were surprised by the declaration. In fact, some of them even pointed out that it was a logical idea. (Allied 17) A year earlier, the idea would have been unthinkable. But the Allied position had changed much for the better in the previous twelve months, making the proposal valid. In fact, the big doings were agreed upon without much disapproval. Still, the Conference did have its critics. There was more than one unfavorable editorial written about the Conference. One critic felt that Roosevelt would have been better off visiting a battle and seeing the horrors first hand. The critic, Wendell Willkie, went on to say that the Conference wasn't a big success because Stalin was missing.

The importance of the unconditional surrender declaration can be see in several ways. First, it showed both the British and American desire to permanently eliminate the threat of Germany. This assured the Soviets that the U.S. and Britain were in the fight to the end, thus encouraging the Soviets to keep fighting on the western front, even while a cross-channel attack was being delayed. Secondly, the declaration crushed any hope Hitler may have had of a peace negotiation. It was believed that this declaration hung Hitler out to dry, leaving him to face his foreseeable defeat. This Conference helped to pave the way for the final Allied victory in Europe, V-Day.

                       B.Huldah Original's Negitives Casablanca Conference







The Conference was also the first time that the two disassociated French leaders, Henri Giraud and Charles de Gaulle, were brought together. When first invited to Casablanca, Giraud quickly accepted the invitation, but de Gaulle initially refused. Only after Churchill threatened to withdraw support from him and his French government, operating from Britain, did de Gaulle hesitantly accept the invitation. At the Conference, a picture of the two French leaders shaking hands was taken. They also issued a joint statement saying, "'We have met. We have talked. We have registered our entire agreement on the end to be achieved which is the liberation of France . . . This end will be attained by a union in war of all Frenchmen.'" (Allied 17) This photography and statement were very superficial and deceiving. The two French leaders were still unwilling to cooperate. Despite the efforts by Roosevelt, Giraud and de Gaulle both refused to join together forming a single unified Free French command.

The Casablanca Conference marked the beginning of the end for Hitler and his Nazis. The Conference helped to unit the Allied powers. The unconditional surrender declaration, resulting from the Conference still affects us today. Had the Allies not insisted on total unconditional surrender, Hitler might have negotiated a peace settlement and could have continued to be in power and cause additional disasters. The Casablanca Conference is notable for historical reasons, not relating to the war. Historically, it has been shown to be one of the last times when Great Britain could try to assert itself over the United States. The decline of the British economy along with the increase in U.S. Nationalism and the U.S. economy, brought about the inevitable shift in power. The U.S. was destined to be a superpower, but Great Britain was not.

Still, at Casablanca the two leading Allied nation were able to work together on equal ground. Under the leadership of Roosevelt and Churchill, the two nations began the task of preparing for the end of the war and a new global era.

If the 1940-41 London Blitz is any indication, the recent terror bombings are contrived.

The first air raid on London by the Nazis took place Sept. 7, 1940 and killed 306 people.

After touring the ruins, Winston Churchill remarked, "They cheered me as if I'd given them victory, instead of getting their houses bombed to bits."

Churchill is telling the truth. Unknown to Londoners, he had rejected Hitler's proposal to spare civilian targets. Quite the opposite, he goaded Hitler into bombing London by hitting Berlin and other civilian targets first.

Churchill told his Air Marshall: "Never mistreat an enemy by halves" and instructed his cabinet, "bombing of military objectives, increasingly widely interpreted, seems our best road home at present." He blocked the Red Cross from monitoring civilian casualties. (440)

Before the end of Sept. 1940, 7,000 Londoners including 700 children lay dead. By the end of the war, more than 60,000 British civilians and 650,000 German civilians died from "strategic" bombing.

In 1940, Churchill had to divert attacks from RAF airfields but he also wanted to start the bloodletting. A year had passed with little action. It was being called the "phony war." Hitler was making generous peace offers that many Englishmen wanted to accept.

If Britain had made peace, there would not have been a Jewish holocaust.

Churchill described the Second World War as the "most unnecessary war in history." But he served bankers in the City who had made good his stock market losses and saved his beloved Chart well from foreclosure. A manic-depressive, he thrived on the rush of war and cared little for ordinary people.

I realize this is not the saccharine history we are spoon-fed. What we term "history" is mostly propaganda, i.e. a cover-up.

What light does it shed on the recent bombings in London? The Second World War was a big step in a long-term program to enslave humanity in a world dictatorship run by the Illuminati (London-based monopoly capital.)

The Second World War was incredibly productive for the Illuminati agenda of global control. It led to an explosion of globally-centralized institutions, like the United Nations and the European Community, now Union, and many others in finance, business, and the military. Precisely what they wanted. It also put countries under an enormous burden of debt on loans provided to all sides by...the Rothschild's and the Illuminati.

The Illuminati start wars to increase their wealth and power and to control, reshape and brutalize society. The "War on Terror" is intended to make us forfeit civil rights and engage in yet another unnecessary war, this time against Islam.

Most politicians are flunkies, con men, traitors and criminals, packaged and sold by (banker-owned) mass media and universities.   

                 Hap Arnold 

                        ↓  Login in and see Home page



The United States went "bankrupt" in 1933. President Roosevelt Executive Order 6073, 6102, 6111, 6260. Senate Report 93-549, pgs, 187 & 594, 1973.

“Beware the leader who bangs the drums of war in order to whip the citizenry into a patriotic fervor, for patriotism is indeed a double-edged sword. It both emboldens the blood, just as it narrows the mind. And when the drums of war have reached a fever pitch and the blood boils with hate and the mind has closed, the leader will have no need in seizing the rights of the citizenry. Rather, the citizenry, infused with fear and blinded by patriotism, will offer up all of their rights unto the leader and gladly so. How do I know? For this is what I have done. And I am Caesar.”

— Julius Caesar


                           War and the bank

"Government is not reason; it is not eloquence; it is force! Like fire, it a dangerous servant and a fearful master." George Washington.

How our God-given rights were turned into government-granted privileges.

U.S. Citizens are declared Enemies of the U.S. Government: An examination of the Emergency War Powers Act of 1963.

"During World War I (WWI), the U.S. Congress passed the Trading With the Enemy Act (12 USC Sec. 95a, October 6, 1917). This Act was later amended into the Banking Relief Act of March 9, 1933 (Title 12 USC 95 (b); c 1, Title 1, Sec. 48 Stat. 1). By means of that amendment, the United States has been operating under War And Emergency Powers since March 9, 1933.

"Under the 1933 Banking Relief Act, the federal government declared the Bank Holiday of March 6, 1933, and relieved the banks from their contractual obligation to the American people of redeeming their Federal Reserve Notes in gold (the Federal Reserve Note originally constituted a warehouse receipt for real gold which the people had placed on deposit with the banks).

"The original Trading With the Enemy Act of October 6, 1917, was enacted at a time when the United States was at war with Germany (WWI), and is therefore Constitutional under Article I, Sec. 8, Cl. 11, U.S. Constitution:

"'Congress shall have the power to declare War, grant Letters of Margue and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water.'

"The amended version (1933) of the original Trading With the Enemy Act (1917) was approved and passed by Congress on March 9, 1933. This amended version was enacted at a time when the United States was not at War with any foreign foe.

"Further, the amended version (1933) was radically different from the 1917 version. In 1917, the jurisdiction of the Trading With the Enemy Act excluded all citizens of the United States. However the 1933 version included citizens of the United States under its jurisdiction by adding the following language:

"'By any person within the United States of any place subject to the jurisdiction thereof.'

"Under the amended version (1933) of the 1917 Act and by operation of law, the American people became the same status as the foreign 'Enemy' of 1917. As such all Americans were therefore subject to regulations, rules, licenses, orders and proclamations issued by the President of the United States or the Secretary of the Treasury since March 9, 1933 (12 USC 95b).

"After the American people were declared to be 'enemies,' all legal and commercial intercourse became illegal, and the only way one could do business or any type of legal intercourse was to obtain permission from our government by means of a form of license (by law, a 'license' is a permit to do that which would otherwise be illegal).

"As you might expect, our government normally protects the United States by restricting the activities of 'enemies.' For example, we wouldn't expect the federal government to allow communist agents to travel freely or open a business in our country. Nevertheless, there are times when the government might allow members of an 'enemy' nation to travel from New York to Chicago. For example, when athletes of the former Soviet Union came to America, our government granted them special permission ('licenses') to do that (travel) which would otherwise be prohibited for Russian agents.

"That our government might 'license' foreigners who might be enemies is unremarkable, but whoever imagined that our own government licensed us for the very same reason? Today, if one wants to travel, one has to have a Driver's license; if one wants to work, one must obtain a license (Social Security Card). It has sometimes been said, one will not be able to buy, sell,or trade without the Mark (Margue--License of Reprisal, Black's Law Dictionary, 5th ed.).

"By Executive Order 2039 of March 6, 1933, and Executive Order 2040 of March 9, 1933, the belligerent (now) United States (federal government) acting under the War Power seized title to all gold (lawful, constitutional money), took physical possession of all the money, and left the American people penniless, bankrupt, and without means to lawfully pay their debts.

"After the United States had seized title and took physical possession of the people's (lawful) money, the government found it necessary to issue a new form of currency in order for the people to carry on normal business transactions. This new currency was in the form of Federal Reserve Bank Notes (War and Emergency currency), and not Federal Reserve Notes (warehouse receipts for gold).

"'This new money will be worth 100 cents on the dollar because it is backed by the credit of the Nation. It will represent a mortgage on all the homes and other property of all the people in the Nation' (Congressional Record, March 19, 1933).

"The people were now prohibited from being able to pay their debts at law (i.e., with lawful money/gold) and were forced to mortgage their goods and services to one of the banks or lending institutions in order to obtain Federal Reserve Bank Notes in order to discharge (not lawfully 'pay') their debts. The people now being classified as the 'enemy' also became the captured chattel property of the United States to secure the debt (Federal Reserve Bank Notes).

"The governors of the states of the Union capitulated to the demands of President Roosevelt on March 6, 1933 (Roosevelt papers 1933). The former states of the Union became nothing more than political subdivisions or occupied territories of the belligerent corporate United States (Butler v. U.S. Supreme Court, 1936, Public Law 93-549).

"The former judicial Courts (Courts of Justice (now took silent judicial notice of the Maritime (International) In Rem jurisdiction, and took the role as Executive Officers (not Judicial) to enforce the Federal and State statutes in all cases whatever. The judges and lawyers in essence became nothing more than executive political hatchet men of their branch of government to enforce public policy statutes enacted by Congress and to enforce performance on this new commercial paper (Federal Reserve Bank Notes) in order to give it some sort of value.

"Once the people were declared to be the 'Enemy,' they lost all their unalienable rights under the (unlawfully suspended) Constitution and Bill of Rights. Since 1933, the American people have had no unalienable rights to life, liberty, and property... unless (until) these presumptions are opposed, denied, and rebutted (Remedy--due process--5th and 14th Amendments, Constitution of the United States of America).

This section of the Proclamation clearly states that all proclamations heretofore or hereafter issued by the President are approved and confirmed, citing authority of Section 5 (b).

The keywords here being "all" and "approved". Further:

"Whereas, said national emergency still continues, and it is necessary to take further measures extending beyond March 9, 1933, in order to accomplish such purposes"

We again clearly see that there is more to come, evidenced by the phrase, "further measures extending beyond March 9, 1933 . . . . " Could this be the beginning of a new deal? Possibly a one-sided deal. How long can this type of action continue? Let's find out.

"Now, therefore, I, Franklin D. Roosevelt, President of the United States of America, in view of such continuing national emergency and by virtue of the authority vested in me by Section 5 (b) of the Act of October 6, 1917 (40 Stat. L. 411) as amended by the Act of March 9, 1933, do hereby proclaim, order, direct and declare that all the terms and provisions of said Proclamation of March 6, 1933, and the regulations and orders issued thereunder are hereby continued in full force and effect until further proclamation by the President."

We now understand that the Proclamation 2039, of March 6, 1933 and Proclamation 2040 of March 9, 1933, will continue until such time as another proclamation is made by "the President". Note that the term "the President" is not specific to President Roosevelt; it is a generic term which can equally apply to any President from Roosevelt to the present, and beyond.

So, here we have President Roosevelt declaring a national emergency (we are now beginning to realize the full significance of those words) and closing the national banks for two days, by Executive Order. Further, he states that the Proclamations bringing about these actions will continue "in full force and effect" until such time as the President, and only the President, changes the situation.

It is important to note the fact that these Proclamations were made on March 6, 1933, three days before Congress was due to convene in extra session. Yet references are made to such things as the amended Section 5 (b) which has not yet even been confirmed by Congress. President Roosevelt must have been supremely confident of Congress' confirmation of his actions. And indeed, we find that confidence was justified. For on March 9, 1933, without individual Congressmen even having the opportunity to read for themselves the bill they were to confirm, Congress did indeed approve the amendment of Section 5 (b) of the Act of October 6, 1917.

Referring to the Public Papers of Herbert Hoover:

"That those speculators and insiders were right was plain enough later on. This first contract of the 'moneychangers' with the New Deal netted those who removed their money from the country a profit of up to 60 percent when the dollar was debased."

Where had our gold gone? Our gold had already been moved offshore. The gold was not in the banks, and when We, the People lined up at the door attempting to have our contracts honored, the deception was exposed. What happened then? The laws were changed to prevent us from asking again, and the military was brought in to protect the Federal Reserve. We, the People, were declared to be the same as public enemy and placed under military authority.

Going now to another section of 48 Statute 1:

"Whenever in the judgment of the Secretary of the Treasury such action is necessary to protect the currency system of the United States, the Secretary of the Treasury, in his discretion, may require any or all individuals, partnerships, associations and corporations to pay and deliver to the Treasurer of the United States any or all gold coin, gold bullion, and gold certificates owned by such individuals, partnerships, associations and corporations."

By this Statute, everyone was required to turn in their gold. Failure to do so would constitute a violation of this provision, such violation to be punishable by a fine of not more than $10,000.00 and imprisonment for not more than ten years. It was a seizure. Whose property may be seized without due process of law under the Trading with the Enemy Act? The enemy's. Whose gold was seized? Ours,­ the gold of the people of the United States.

From the Roosevelt Papers:

"During this banking holiday it was at first believed that some form of script or emergency currency would be necessary for the conduct of ordinary business. We knew that it would be essential when the banks reopened to have an adequate supply of currency to meet all possible demands of depositors. Consideration was given by government officials and various local agencies to the advisability of issuing clearing-house certificates or some similar form of local emergency currency. On March 7, 1933, the Secretary of the Treasury issued a regulation authorizing clearing houses to issue demand certificates against sound assets of the banking institutions, but this authority was not to become effective until March 10th. In many cities, the printing of these certificates was actually begun, but after the passage of the Emergency Banking Act of March 9, 1933 (48 Stat. 1), it became evident that they would not be needed, because the Act made possible the issue of the necessary amount of emergency currency in the form of Federal Reserve bank-notes which could be based on any sound assets owned by banks."

Roosevelt could now issue emergency currency under the Act of March 9, 1933 and this currency was to be called Federal Reserve bank notes. From Title 4 of the Act of March 9, 1933:

"Upon the deposit with the Treasurer of the United State, (a) of any direct obligations of the United States or (b) of any notes, drafts, bills of exchange or bankers' acceptance acquired under the provisions of this Act, any Federal Reserve Bank making such deposit in the manner prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury shall be entitled to received from the Comptroller of the currency circulating notes in blank, duly registered and countersigned."

What is this saying? It says (emphasis is ours): "Upon the deposit with the Treasurer of the United States, (a) of any direct obligation of the United States . . ." What is a direct obligation of the United States? It's a treasury note, which is an obligation upon whom? Upon We, the People, to perform. It's a taxpayer obligation, isn't it?

Title 4 goes on: "or (b) of any notes, drafts, bills of exchange or bankers' acceptances . . . . " What's a note? If you go to the bank and sign a note on your home, that's a note, isn't it? A note is a private obligation upon We, the People. And if the Federal Reserve Bank deposits either (a) public and/or (b) private obligation of We, the People, with the Treasury, the Comptroller of the currency will issue this circulating note endorsed in blank, duly registered and countersigned, an emergency currency based on the (a) public and/or (b) private obligations of the people of the United States.

In the Congressional Record of March 9, 1933, we find evidence that our congressmen didn't even have individual copies of the bill to read, on which they were about to vote. A copy of the bill was passed around for approximately 40 minutes.

Congressman McFadden made the comment:

"Mr. Speaker, I regret that the membership of the House has had no opportunity to consider or even read this bill. The first opportunity I had to know what this legislation is, was when it was read from the clerk's desk. It is an important banking bill. It is a dictatorship over finance in the United States. It is complete control over the banking system in the United States . . . It is difficult under the circumstances to discuss this bill. The first section of the bill, as I grasped it, is practically the war powers that were given back in 1917."

Congressman McFadded later says:

"I would like to ask the chairman of the committee if this is a plan to change the holding of the security back of the Federal Reserve notes to the Treasury of the United States rather than the Federal Reserve agent."

Keep in mind, here, that, prior to 1933, the Federal Reserve bank held our gold as security, in return for Federal Reserve gold notes which we could redeem at any time we wanted. Now, however, Congressman McFadden is asking if this proposed bill is a plan to change who's going to hold the security, from the Federal Reserve to the Treasury.

Chairman Steagall's response to Congressman McFadden's question, again from the Congressional Record.:

"This provision is for the issuance of Federal Reserve bank notes; and not for Federal Reserve notes; and the security back of it is the obligations, notes, drafts, bills of exchange, bank acceptances, outlined in the section to which the gentleman has referred."

We were backed by gold, and our gold was seized, wasn't it? We were penniless, and now our money would be secured, not by gold, but by notes and obligations on which We, the People were the collateral security.

Congressman McFadden then questioned:

"Then the new circulation is to be Federal Reserve bank notes and not Federal Reserve notes. Is that true?"

Mr. Steagall replied:

"Insofar as the provisions of this section are concerned, yes."

Does that sound familiar?

Next we hear from Congressman Britten, as noted in the Congressional Record:

"From my observations of the bill as it was read to the House, it would appear that the amount of bank notes that might be issued by the Federal Reserve System is not limited. That will depend entirely upon the amount of collateral that is presented from time to time for exchange for bank notes. Is that not correct?"

Who is the collateral? We are;­ we are chattel, aren't we? We have no rights. Our rights were suspended along with the Constitution. We became chattel property to the corporate government, our transactions and obligations, the collateral for the issuance of Federal Reserve bank notes.

Congressman Patman, speaking from the Congressional Record:

"The money will be worth 100 cents on the dollar because it is backed by the credit of the Nation. It will represent a mortgage on all the homes and other property of all the people in the Nation."

It now is no wonder that credit became so available after the Depression. It was needed to back our monetary system. Our debts, our obligations, our homes, our jobs ­ we were now slaves for the system.

From Statutes at Large, in the Congressional Record:

"When required to do so by the Secretary of the Treasury, each Federal Reserve agent shall act as agent of the Treasury of the United States or of the Comptroller of the currency, or both, for the performance of any functions which the Treasurer or the Comptroller may be called upon to perform in carrying out the provisions of this paragraph."

The Federal Reserve was taken over by the Treasury. The Treasury holds the assets. We are the collateral ­ourselves and our property.